Legal Opinion

Nevada Cornell Silver Mines, Inc. v. Hankins

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided July 5, 1929No. 2806PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Service of summons by a party or his attorney is invalid at common law and is invalid under Nevada statutes. The record shows summons in case No. 1682 was served or attempted to be served by V.H. Vargas, who admittedly was the attorney for plaintiff in that case. We assert such service was void and conferred no jurisdiction.

At common law the service of summons had to be by an indifferent person — one who was not interested in the litigation. 8 Bacon Abr., p. 690; 1 Blackstone Com., pp. 344-349.

By statutory enactment the common law exists in this state except where expressly changed by…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. People ex rel. Pierce v. MorrillCalifornia Supreme Court · 1864
  2. Escalle v. MarkNevada Supreme Court · 1919
  3. Snydacker v. BrosseIllinois Supreme Court · 1869
  4. People ex rel. Lafferty v. FeickeIllinois Supreme Court · 1911
  5. Filkins v. O'SullivanIllinois Supreme Court · 1875

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Sawyer v. Sugarless Shops, Inc.Nevada Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Roth v. NashWashington Supreme Court · 1943
  3. Mulford v. DaveyNevada Supreme Court · 1947
  4. Deboer v. FattorNevada Supreme Court · 1956
  5. Bramlett v. District Court of Marshall CountySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1976

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API