Legal Opinion
Weaver v. Firestone
Supreme Court of Alabama
Decided December 13, 2013No. 1101403PublishedCited by 35 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
On Application for Rehearing
MURDOCK, Justice.
The opinion of January 11, 2013, is withdrawn, and the following is substituted therefor.
This Court granted Carl Weaver permission to appeal the Coosa Circuit Court’s denial of his motion to dismiss the complaint filed against him by Roger D. Firestone. See Rule 5, Ala. R.App. P. Because the trial court correctly concluded that Firestone’s action might not be time-barred and thus was not due to be dismissed at this stage of the proceeding on that ground, we affirm the trial court’s order denying Weaver’s motion to dismiss.
I. Facts and Procedural…
2Cases cited51 opinions
- Pace v. DiGuglielmoSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Irwin v. Department of Veterans AffairsSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Jolly v. Eli Lilly & Co.California Supreme Court · 1988
- Sergey Spitsyn v. Robert Moore, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Frank T. Miller v. New Jersey State Department of Corrections Donald E. Lewis, Warden/administrator Attorney General of the State of New JerseyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1998
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- Marlon Mormann v. Iowa Workforce DevelopmentSupreme Court of Iowa · 2018
- FAUSTO VS. SANCHEZ-FLORESNevada Supreme Court · 2021
- Arrington v. Courtyard Citiflats, LLCSupreme Court of Alabama · 2015
- Stewart v. Bureaus Investment Group 1, LLCDistrict Court, M.D. Alabama · 2014
- Johnson ex rel. Thompson v. ReddochSupreme Court of Alabama · 2015
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.