Legal Opinion

Woodstock v. Whitaker

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided March 10, 1944No. 3391PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By the Court,

Orr, C. J.:

This appeal requires a determination of what constitutes the issuance of summons as that term is used in section 8573 N. C. L. 1929. It is asserted that the signing and sealing of a summons by the clerk of the court and the placing of the same in the hands of the attorney for the plaintiff constitutes an issuance of the summons. On the other hand it is argued that something more must be done, namely, that the summons be placed in the hands of some person qualified to serve process, or that it pass out of the hands of the party signing and sealing it, with the…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Lux v. HagginCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
  2. Van Dyke v. Superior CourtArizona Supreme Court · 1922
  3. Marshall v. MatsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1908
  4. Reeves & Co. v. RussellNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1914
  5. State Ex Rel. Brooks v. CookMontana Supreme Court · 1929

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Howard v. Waale-Camplan & Tiberti, Inc.Nevada Supreme Court · 1950
  2. Deboer v. FattorNevada Supreme Court · 1956
  3. Deboer v. FattorNevada Supreme Court · 1956

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API