Legal Opinion
Singleton v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided December 16, 2002No. 02-712CPublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MARGOLIS, Senior Judge.
Plaintiff, Casey V. Singleton, appearing pro se, seeks recovery of military back pay from the defendant United States, that he claims is owed to him. The government has moved to dismiss plaintiffs complaint pursuant to United States Court of Federal Claims Rule (“RCFC”) 12(b)(1) for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, or in the alternative, pursuant to RCFC 12(b)(6), for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. After consideration of the briefs, defendant’s motion to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction is DENIED. Defendant’s motion…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- United States v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Colonel David W. Palmer, II v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1999
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- CW Government Travel, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2004
- United States v. FischerCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2005
- Holland v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2004
- Quinton v. States StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2005
- Jentoft v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2005
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.