Legal Opinion

Jentoft v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided March 23, 2005No. 03-1812PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

GEORGE W. MILLER, Judge.

This matter is before the Court on defendant’s motion under United States Court of Federal Claims Rules (“RCFC”) 12(b)(1) and 12(b)(6) to dismiss Counts III and IV of the complaint, entitled “Equal Pay Act Claim” and “Equal Pay Act Retaliation Claim,” respectively. After the initial briefing of defendant’s motion, the Court requested that the parties submit supplemental briefs on the question whether plaintiff was a dual status technician. Defendant filed its supplemental brief on December 17, 2004, and plaintiff filed its supplemental brief on January…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  4. McNutt v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
  5. Ernst & Ernst v. HochfelderSupreme Court of the United States · 1976

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Walch v. Adjutant General's DepartmentCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2008
  2. Jentoft v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
  3. Walch v. Adjutant Gen Dept TXCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2008
  4. Walch v. Adjutant Gen Dept TXCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API