Legal Opinion
Colonel David W. Palmer, II v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided February 23, 1999No. 19-1633PublishedCited by 438 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PLAGER, Circuit Judge.
This is a military pay case. The United States Court of Federal Claims rendered judgment against Colonel David W. Palmer II on his claim for pay he alleged to have been wrongfully denied. See Palmer v. United States, 38 Fed. Cl. 316 (1997). Col. Palmer appeals the judgment. Because Col. Palmer, as an officer not on regular active duty, is not entitled to pay for duty he did not perform, we affirm the decision of the Court of Federal Claims.
BACKGROUND
After five years of active duty as a regular officer in the U.S. Army, Col. Palmer became a member of the U.S. Army Reserve…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- United States v. TestanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Sanders v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1979
- John D. Holley v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1997
- Terrence L. Adkins v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1996
- Denis E. Dehne v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1992
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by438 opinions
- Fisher v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
- Gabriel J. Martinez v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2003
- Metz v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
- Bernard v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2004
- Barnick v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2010
433 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.