Gerstein v. Axtell
Alaska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
EASTAUGH, Justice.
I. INTRODUCTION
Gerstein Communications (GC) is a cable television franchisee. Citing the access provisions of the Cable Communications Policy Act of 1984, 47 U.S.C. § 521 et seq. (the “Cable Act”), GC sued landowners Howard and Patricia Axtell and the Golden Valley Electric Association (GVEA) to obtain access to use a private easement owned by GVEA and located on the Axtells’ property. The superior court granted partial summary judgment to GVEA and the Axtells, and held that 47 U.S.C. § 541(a)(2) does not give cable franchisees access to private easements. 1 Because…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Loretto v. Teleprompter Manhattan CATV Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- City & Borough of Juneau v. ThibodeauAlaska Supreme Court · 1979
- Greater Anchorage Area Borough v. City of AnchorageAlaska Supreme Court · 1972
- Kodiak Seafood Processors Ass'n v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1995
- O'CALLAGHAN v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1996
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Fairbanks Fire Fighters Ass'n, Local 1324 v. City of FairbanksAlaska Supreme Court · 2002
- Ulmer v. Alaska Restaurant & Beverage Ass'nAlaska Supreme Court · 2001
- State v. CarlinAlaska Supreme Court · 2011
- Garrison v. DixonAlaska Supreme Court · 2001
- Mullins v. Local Boundary CommissionAlaska Supreme Court · 2010
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.