Legal Opinion

Gerstein v. Axtell

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided June 19, 1998No. S-7514PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

EASTAUGH, Justice.

I. INTRODUCTION

Gerstein Communications (GC) is a cable television franchisee. Citing the access provisions of the Cable Communications Policy Act of 1984, 47 U.S.C. § 521 et seq. (the “Cable Act”), GC sued landowners Howard and Patricia Axtell and the Golden Valley Electric Association (GVEA) to obtain access to use a private easement owned by GVEA and located on the Axtells’ property. The superior court granted partial summary judgment to GVEA and the Axtells, and held that 47 U.S.C. § 541(a)(2) does not give cable franchisees access to private easements. 1 Because…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Loretto v. Teleprompter Manhattan CATV Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. City & Borough of Juneau v. ThibodeauAlaska Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Greater Anchorage Area Borough v. City of AnchorageAlaska Supreme Court · 1972
  4. Kodiak Seafood Processors Ass'n v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1995
  5. O'CALLAGHAN v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1996

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Fairbanks Fire Fighters Ass'n, Local 1324 v. City of FairbanksAlaska Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Ulmer v. Alaska Restaurant & Beverage Ass'nAlaska Supreme Court · 2001
  3. State v. CarlinAlaska Supreme Court · 2011
  4. Garrison v. DixonAlaska Supreme Court · 2001
  5. Mullins v. Local Boundary CommissionAlaska Supreme Court · 2010

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API