Legal Opinion
State v. Anderson
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided November 19, 1991No. 14226PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBerdon, J.
The sole issue in this appeal is whether a criminal defendant who agrees to plead guilty to certain charges in consideration of the state’s promise to recommend a sentence that is below the statutory maximum, while reserving the right to argue for a lesser sentence, has entered into a “plea agreement” within the meaning of General Statutes § 51-195.1 Under *402§ 51-195, if the trial court imposes a sentence that was negotiated as part of a “plea agreement,” the defendant is not entitled to have the sentence review division of the Superior Court review the imposed sentence. In this case, the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- North Carolina v. AlfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Hinchliffe v. American Motors Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
- State v. NardiniSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
- State v. AmarilloSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
- Willoughby v. City of New HavenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1937
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- State v. CampbellSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
- State v. GuckianConnecticut Appellate Court · 1992
- State v. GuckianSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
- State v. GambleConnecticut Appellate Court · 1992
- King v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2002
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.