King v. Commissioner of Correction
Connecticut Appellate Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
2Per curiam
The petitioner, Robert W. King, appeals from the judgment of the habeas court denying his amended petition for a writ of habeas corpus. The petitioner claims that the court improperly failed to conclude that his trial counsel was ineffective during plea negotiations and that prejudice resulted to the petitioner. We affirm the judgment of the habeas court.
The following facts and procedural history are relevant. In connection with acts he was alleged to have committed against his live-in girlfriend on July 30,1996, the petitioner was charged with unlawful restraint in the first degree in…
3Cases cited12 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Hill v. LockhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- North Carolina v. AlfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Bunkley v. Commissioner of CorrectionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
- Ghant v. CommissionerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2000
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by13 opinions
- Bowden v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2006
- Hunnicutt v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2004
- Thompson v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2011
- Harris v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2008
- Atkinson v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2010
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.