Legal Opinion

Tormey v. Miller

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 19, 1916No. Civ. No. 1547PublishedCited by 8 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtHart, J.

The defendant in this action was awarded judgment, from which this appeal, supported by a bill of exceptions and a stipulation admitting as true certain facts, is prosecuted by the plaintiff.

The facts as agreed upon by the stipulation of the parties are with accuracy synoptically stated in the opening brief of counsel for the plaintiff, and we, therefore, adopt said statement thereof, together with the statement of the legal propositions submitted here for decision by the appellant.

“Appellant brought an action in the superior court of this state for Butte County, against respondent, for goods…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Hill v. HardingSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
  2. Opinion of the Justices to the SenateMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1900
  3. Rosenthal v. NoveMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1900
  4. Bank of Commerce v. ElliottWisconsin Supreme Court · 1901
  5. Rosenthal v. PerkinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Pue v. WheelerMontana Supreme Court · 1927
  2. Sparks v. BucknerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
  3. Wiley B. Allen Co. v. WoodCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1916
  4. Black v. MillikenWashington Supreme Court · 1927
  5. Steinhauer & Wight Inc. v. AdairCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1917

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API