Rosenthal v. Nove
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Tort, for personal injuries. Writ dated July 7,1898. Trial in the Superior Court, before Hopkins, J., who overruled a motion for stay of proceedings and directed that a special judgment be entered ; and the defendants alleged exceptions. The facts appear in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtBarker, J.
After verdict and before judgment, the defendants were adjudicated bankrupts, and thereafter they filed a suggestion of that fact and moved that all proceedings be stayed. This motion was denied and a special judgment entered to enable the plaintiff to proceed against the sureties upon a bond, given more than four months before the bankruptcy, to dissolve an attachment. The exceptions raise the question whether the court had power to overrule the motion for a stay, and to direct the entry of a special judgment. The answer depends upon the provisions of the United States Bankruptcy Act of July…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Hill v. HardingSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
- Hill v. HardingSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
- Ray v. WightMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1876
- Holland v. MartinMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1877
3Cited by33 opinions
- Brennan v. Election CommissionersMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1942
- Vadner v. VadnerDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 1918
- Rogers v. AbbotMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1910
- Feigenspan v. McDonnellMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1909
- Parker v. MurphyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1913
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.