Rosenthal v. Perkins
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Madera County and from an order denying a new trial. W. M. Conley, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
BRITT, C.
The plaintiffs here sued one Brusie in a justice’s court, and procured a writ of attachment to he issued which was levied by the township constable on one hundred tons of hay, the property of Brusie. Afterward, the defendants in the present ease executed an undertaking in which was recited that Brusie had appeared in such action in the justice’s court, and *242applied for an order to discharge the attachment “upon the execution of an undertaking in accordance with the provisions of sections 554 and 555 of the Code of Civil Procedure,” and that said court had fixed the amount of such…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Mullally v. TownsendCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
- Drake v. WhiteMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1875
- Bunneman & Martononi v. WagnerOregon Supreme Court · 1888
- Gass v. WilliamsIndiana Supreme Court · 1874
- Palmer v. VanceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1859
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Guaranty Security Corp. v. OppenheimerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1923
- Pue v. WheelerMontana Supreme Court · 1927
- San Francisco Sulphur Co. v. Aetna Indemnity Co.California Court of Appeal · 1909
- Tormey v. MillerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1916
- D. C. Wise Coal Co. v. Columbia Zinc & Lead Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1911
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.