Wiley B. Allen Co. v. Wood
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Sacramento County, and from an order denying a new trial. Charles 0. Busieb, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtHart, J.
This is an action in replevin and arises out of a conditional sale^of a piano to the defendant by the plaintiff.
The contract for the sale was reduced to writing and was entered into by the parties at the city of Sacramento on the fifth day of June, 1913, and the agreement was so dated. The agreement is in substance as follows: That the defendant was to pay the plaintiff the sum of one thousand dollars, at the latter’s office, in the city of San Francisco, for said piano as follows: A “Star Piano Oak,” etc., valued at three hundred dollars; two hundred dollars on the fifth day of June, 1913,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Leavens v. Pinkham & McKevittCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
- Robinson v. American Fish & Oyster Co.California Court of Appeal · 1911
- Stevens v. Selma Fruit Co., Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1912
- Hegler v. EddyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1879
- Anglo-Californian Bank, Ltd. v. CerfCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Ernst v. SearleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933
- County First National Bank v. Coast Dairies & Land Co.California Court of Appeal · 1941
- Silverstin v. Kohler & ChaseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
- Gill v. Goldfield Consolidated Mines Co.Nevada Supreme Court · 1919
- Agalianos v. American Central InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1923
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.