Legal Opinion

Black v. Milliken

Washington Supreme Court

Decided April 5, 1927No. 20257. Department OnePublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFrench, J.

The appellants are real estate brokers. Action was brought by them against respondents to recover a real estate commission. A demurrer was sustained to the original complaint. Thereafter an amended complaint was filed, and a motion to strike from the amended complaint and a demurrer thereto, which were sustained. The appellants electing to stand upon their amended complaint, final judgment was entered and this appeal prosecuted therefrom.

Appellants ’ cause of action rests on paragraph 2 of the amended complaint, which reads as follows:

“That on or about August 12, 1924, the defendants employed…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Cushing v. Monarch Timber Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Broadway Hospital & Sanitarium v. DeckerWashington Supreme Court · 1907
  3. Rogers v. LippyWashington Supreme Court · 1918
  4. Forland v. BoyumWashington Supreme Court · 1909
  5. Nance v. ValentineWashington Supreme Court · 1918

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Geoghegan v. DeverWashington Supreme Court · 1948
  2. Bonded Adjustment Co. v. EdmundsWashington Supreme Court · 1947
  3. Realty Mart Corporation v. StandringWashington Supreme Court · 1931
  4. Showcase Realty, Inc. v. WhittakerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977
  5. Showcase Realty, Inc. v. M. K. WhittakerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1977

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API