Legal Opinion

Snader v. London & Lancashire Indemnity Co. of America

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 11, 1948No. Appeal, 209PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Horace Stern,

We are concerned here, with the,proper interpretation of an accident liability insurance policy with .regard to the extent, of its coverage,

Plaintiff, the insured, is the lessee of a large tract of land on which there is laid out a golf course and which contains also a restaurant and dance floor, a recreation .hall, bowling alleys, a swimming pool, bathhouses, a/nd. other structures. The. policy provides, for insurance against liability for accidents arising out of ‘.‘hazards” which are defined as “The ownership, maintenance or use, for the purposes stated…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Lewis v. Fidelity & Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
  2. Humphreys v. Nat'l Benefit Ass'nSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1891
  3. Koser v. American Casualty Co. of ReadingSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1947
  4. Tennant v. Hartford Steam Boiler Inspection & InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1944
  5. Hoover v. National Casualty Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1942

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Vrabel v. SCHOLLERSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1952
  2. Slate Construction Co. v. Bituminous Casualty Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  3. Gulf Insurance Co. v. MacK Warehouse CorporationDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1962
  4. Farber v. Perkiomen Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1952
  5. Chesapeake & Potomac Telephone Co. v. Allegheny Construction Co.District Court, D. Maryland · 1972

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API