Legal Opinion

Vrabel v. SCHOLLER

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 7, 1952No. Appeal, 210PublishedCited by 68 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Bell,

Vrabel was injured by the negligent operation of an automobile by Scholler, against whom he recovered a verdict and judgment in the amount of $5,500. Scholler notified Penn Mutual Indemnity Company, which is one of the defendants herein, and the Colonial Mutual Casualty Company (as an additional insurer), of plaintiff’s claim, and requested each of them to defend the trespass action brought by Vrabel against him.

Plaintiff issued a writ of attachment execution and served defendant company as garnishee on the theory that it was Scholler’s insurance carrier. Defendant…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Waldman v. ShoemakerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
  2. Austin-Nichols & Co. v. Union Trust Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
  3. Shaull v. AS Beck New York Shoe Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1952
  4. Kittaning Coal Co. v. MooreSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1949
  5. Humphreys v. Nat'l Benefit Ass'nSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1891

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by68 opinions

  1. Davis v. Pennzoil Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1970
  2. Fireman's Fund Insurance v. Nationwide Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  3. Bogojavlensky v. LoganSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
  4. Buzzone v. Hartford Accident and Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1957
  5. Mather EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963

63 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API