Legal Opinion

Koser v. American Casualty Co. of Reading

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 3, 1947No. Appeal, 145PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Dithrich, J.,

The sole question involved in this appeal is whether or not a Farmall tractor is an automobile within the "meaning of the term “automobile” as used in an accident insurance policy. The court below on a case stated held that it was, and from the entry of judgment for plaintiff, defendant has appealed.

The case turns on whether the term “automobile” as used in the policy was intended to be used in its ordinary and popular sense, or whether it was employed as a generic term. If the policy is susceptible of both constructions, then it must be liberally construed in favor of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Tennant v. Hartford Steam Boiler Inspection & InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1944
  2. Hoover v. National Casualty Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1942
  3. Deardorff, Admr. v. Cont. L. Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
  4. Teutonia Fire Insurance v. Mund ex rel. BiddleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1883
  5. Weller v. Grange Mutual Casualty Ins.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1932

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Techalloy Co. v. Reliance InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  2. Armon v. Aetna Casualty and Surety Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1952
  3. Ætna Life Ins. Co. of Hartford, Conn. v. BidwellTennessee Supreme Court · 1951
  4. Snader v. London & Lancashire Indemnity Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1948
  5. Washington Nat. Ins. Co. v. BurkeCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1953

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API