Legal Opinion

Lewis v. Fidelity & Casualty Co.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 20, 1931No. Appeal, 164PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Kephabt,

De Baccias, a contractor, was engaged in altering a ¡building, and Mary Lewis, a stranger, one of plaintiffs, was injured through the negligent performance of this work by one of the former’s employees. De Baccias had a contract of indemnity with defendant, insuring him “against loss......for damages on account of bodily injuries......suffered as a result of an accident occurring......by any person or persons not employed by the assured, while at or about the work of the assured described in statement 4 of the schedule, during the prosecution of the said work.”…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Malley v. American Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1929
  2. McKeesport Machine Co. v. Ben Franklin InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1896
  3. Nimlet's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
  4. Bingell v. Royal InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1913
  5. Harris Chemical Co. v. Tunnell & Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1918

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Moffat v. Metropolitan Casualty Insurance Co. of New YorkDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1964
  2. Morris v. American Liability & Surety Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  3. Brugnoli v. United National InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  4. Shee v. London Guarantee & Accident Co.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1953
  5. Newman v. Massachusetts Bonding & InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1949

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API