Legal Opinion

Farber v. Perkiomen Mutual Insurance

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 26, 1952No. Appeals, 79 and 80PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Jones,

These appeals are from judgments for the plaintiff against the defendant companies, respectively, in separate actions on policies of fire insurance issued by the defendants to the plaintiff. Both appeals raise the same question of law under identical facts and will, therefore, be disposed of together.

The plaintiff, being the owner of a three-story building in Hyndman, Pa., insured his interest therein with the defendant insurance companies against loss by fire under similar policies, each for one year and “to the extent of the actual cash value of the property at…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Fedas v. Insurance Co. of PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
  2. Patriotic Order Sons of America Hall Ass'n v. Hartford Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
  3. Snader v. London & Lancashire Indemnity Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1948
  4. Metz v. Travelers Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1946

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Elberon Bathing Co., Inc. v. Ambassador Insurance Co., Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1978
  2. Kane v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  3. Travelers Indemnity Co. v. ArmstrongIndiana Court of Appeals · 1979
  4. Burton v. Republic InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
  5. Canulli v. Allstate InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API