Legal Opinion

Norman G. Jensen, Inc. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided August 12, 1976No. C.D. 4668; Court No. 71-12-02025PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Maletz, Judge:

This case involves the proper tariff classification of gunsights that'were manufactured in and-exported from Great Britain and'entered at Minneapolis-St. Paul, Minnesota on August 13, 1970 and September 22, 1970. Plaintiff Jensen was the customs broker and the consignee was Normark Corporation of Minneapolis.

The gunsights in question were classified by the government under item 708.89 of the Tariff Schedules of the United States, as modified by T.D. 68-9, as other optical appliances and instruments and assessed duty at the rate of 31 percent ad valorem.

Plaintiff claims (1) that…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. United States v. BlissCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1915
  2. J. E. Bernard & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1967
  3. Robert Bosch Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1969
  4. Engis Equipment Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1969
  5. Amaco, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1975

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. United States v. Ataka America, Inc.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1977
  2. Corning Glass Works v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1979
  3. Corning Glass Works v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1978
  4. International Business Machines Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1997
  5. Rank Precision Industries, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1980

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API