Legal Opinion

Dwight v. Merritt

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided May 11, 1891No. 281PublishedCited by 38 opinions

ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES ■ FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. The case is stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Lamar

This was an action by an importer, the testator of the present plaintiffs in error, against a late collector of the port of New York, to recover an alleged excess of duty exacted on a cargo of iron rails imported from Pillau, Eussia, in June, ■ 1880.

The collector assessed a duty on- the merchandise at seventy cents per hundred pounds, under Schedule E, sec. 2504,- Eev. Stat., as “ iron bars for railroads or incline planes.” The importer claimed that the merchandise was dutiable at only $8 per ton, under the following provision of the same schedule: “Wrought scrap iron of every description:…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Worthington v. RobbinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1891

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. United States v. Shaun K. O'NeilCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1993
  2. United States v. CitroenSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  3. Harley Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1926
  4. Heartland By-Products, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1999
  5. Engis Equipment Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1969

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API