Legal Opinion

Larry B. Watson Co. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided April 22, 1970No. C.D. 4001PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Re, Judge:

The merchandise, the subject of this protest, consists of rolls of polyvinyl chloride film, colored or metallized on one or both *345sides with shiny lacquer paint, silver or aluminum. It was imported from England in 1964, and is used in the manufacture of tinsel garlands and other decorations, primarily for display or in decorating Christmas trees.

The merchandise was classified as other articles, not specially provided for, of rubber or plastics, under item 174.60 of the Tariff Schedules of the United States, and was assessed with duty at the rate of 17 per centum ad valorem. Plaintiff…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. United States v. CitroenSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  2. United China & Glass Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1968
  3. Engis Equipment Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1969
  4. Sommers Plastic Products Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1967

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. United States v. Canadian Vinyl Industries, Inc.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1977
  2. Marshall Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1971
  3. A. N. Deringer, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1971
  4. Marshall Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1970
  5. V. G. Nahrgang Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API