Legal Opinion
Jungersen v. Baden
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided February 7, 1947PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RIFKIND, District Judge.
In this patent infringement suit plaintiff seeks judgment for damages, profits and injunctive relief. The answers put in issue both validity and infringement and contain counterclaims for declaratory judgment adjudicating the validity of the patent.
The patent in suit is No. 2,118,468 issued to plaintiff on May 24, 1938, on an application filed September 28, 1934. It contains six claims of which the first five relate to a method of casting articles of jewelry of intricate design, and the sixth is for an article of jewelry produced by the method.
Claim 2 reads as follows:…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- The Barbed Wire PatentSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Sinclair & Carroll Co. v. Interchemical Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Michigan Insurance Bank v. EldredSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Dow Chemical Co. v. Halliburton Oil Well Cementing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Cover v. SchwartzCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1942
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Abbott Laboratories v. Sandoz, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2009
- Jungersen v. Ostby & Barton Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Jungersen v. BadenCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1948
- Tri-Wall Containers, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1969
- Barr Rubber Products Company v. Sun Rubber CompanyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1967
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.