Legal Opinion
Jungersen v. Baden
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided March 10, 1948No. 180, Docket 20897PublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CLARK, Circuit Judge.
This appeal involves the validity of Patent-No. 2,118,468 for a “Method of Casting Articles of Intricate Design and A Product Thereof,” issued to the plaintiff on May 24, 1938. Though the answers of both the original and the intervening defendants to the plaintiff’s claim of infringement denied infringement as well as the validity of the patent, the district court found infringement by all the defendants as to at least some of their operations; and that is conceded on this appeal. The court, however, held all the claims of the patent invalid for want of invention and…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Sinclair & Carroll Co. v. Interchemical Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Funk Bros. Seed Co. v. Kalo Inoculant Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Paramount Publix Corp. v. American Triergon Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Dow Chemical Co. v. Halliburton Oil Well Cementing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Toledo Pressed Steel Co. v. Standard Parts, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1939
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Abbott Laboratories v. Sandoz, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2009
- Jungersen v. Ostby & Barton Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Jeoffroy Mfg., Inc. v. William T. Graham. William T. Graham v. Jeoffroy Mfg., IncCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1955
- Zoomar, Inc. v. Paillard Products, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1958
- Sutherland Paper Co. v. Grant Paper Box Co. (Two Cases)Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1950
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.