Legal Opinion

Dow Chemical Co. v. Halliburton Oil Well Cementing Co.

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided March 12, 1945No. Nos. 50, 61PublishedCited by 147 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Murphy

In issue here is the validity of United States Patent No. 1,877,504, relating to “the treatment of deep wells, such as oil, gas, brine or water wells, to increase the output therefrom,” issued to John J. Grebe and Ross T. Sanford on September 12, 1932.

Petitioner, the owner of the patent, brought this suit against respondent for alleged infringement. Both the District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan and the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals held the patent invalid for want of invention and denied relief. 139 F. 2d 473. Previously the Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals, in reversing the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Cuno Engineering Corp. v. Automatic Devices Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
  2. McClain v. OrtmayerSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  3. Smith v. NicholsSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
  4. Paramount Publix Corp. v. American Triergon Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1935
  5. Dunbar v. MyersSupreme Court of the United States · 1876

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by147 opinions

  1. Dickinson v. ZurkoSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  2. Dickinson v. ZurkoSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  3. Jungersen v. Ostby & Barton Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
  4. United States v. Jose Luis Oropeza and Mark James MintonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977
  5. McCullough Tool Co. v. Well Surveys, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1965

142 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API