Legal Opinion

Michigan Insurance Bank v. Eldred

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided February 29, 1892No. 1288PublishedCited by 154 opinions

error to the circuit court oe the united states for the EASTERN DISTRICT OE WISCONSIN. This was an action by the Michigan Insurance Bank, a corporation created and organized under the laws of the State of Michigan, against a citizen of Wisconsin, upon a judgment recovered by the plaintiff against him on May 13, 1862, in an ' inferior court of Michigan for the sum of $4211.56. In the present action, the writ was dated May 11, 1872, and appeared by the marshal’s return thereon…

Read the full summary

error to the circuit court oe the united states for the EASTERN DISTRICT OE WISCONSIN. This was an action by the Michigan Insurance Bank, a corporation created and organized under the laws of the State of Michigan, against a citizen of Wisconsin, upon a judgment recovered by the plaintiff against him on May 13, 1862, in an ' inferior court of Michigan for the sum of $4211.56. In the present action, the writ was dated May 11, 1872, and appeared by the marshal’s return thereon to have been served on. June 3, 1882. The defendant originally pleaded the statute Of limitations of ten years, and on…

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Geat

By the "uniform course of decision, no exceptions to rulings at a trial can be considered by this court, unless they were taken at the trial', and were also embodied in a formal bill of exceptions presented to the judge at the same term, or within a further time allowed by order entered at- that term, or by .standing rule of court, or by consent of parties; and, save under very extraordinary, circumstances, they must be allowed by the judge and filed - with the clerk during the same term. After the term has expired, without the court’s control over the case being reserved by standing rule or…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. In Re WightSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  2. Hunnicutt v. PeytonSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
  3. United States v. BreitlingSupreme Court of the United States · 1858
  4. The Chateaugay Ore & Iron Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1888
  5. Society for the Propagation of the Gospel in Foreign Parts v. Town of PawletSupreme Court of the United States · 1830

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by154 opinions

  1. Hoeltke v. C. M. Kemp Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1936
  2. Waldron v. WaldronSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  3. Exporters of Manufacturers' Products, Inc. v. Butterworth-Judson Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1922
  4. Thiede v. Utah TerritorySupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  5. In Re Proving the Will of BergdorfNew York Court of Appeals · 1912

149 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API