Legal Opinion

Riedman v. Barkwill

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 6, 1934No. Civ. No. 8955PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GRAY, J., pro tem.

Plaintiffs, by tbeir complaint containing the allegations usual for such purpose, sought to quiet their title to lands in Signal Hill, Long Beach. In their answer, defendants pleaded the execution and delivery of an oil and gas lease by plaintiffs, and its assignment to defendants and alleged its full performance by them. The defendants also cross-complained against cross-defendant, a subsequent lessee, to quiet title to their leasehold and to oil-well casing. In answer thereto, cross-defendant alleged that defendants had breached their lease, had abandoned it and the casing…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Utt v. FreyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Northwestern Portland Cement Co. v. Atlantic Portland Cement Co.California Supreme Court · 1917
  3. Ardizonne v. ArcherSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919
  4. Jameson v. Chanslor-Canfield Midway Oil Co.California Supreme Court · 1917
  5. Taylor v. HamiltonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. United States v. M. E. DibbleCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1970
  2. O'Brien v. BestIdaho Supreme Court · 1948
  3. Humphrey v. Placid Oil CompanyDistrict Court, E.D. Texas · 1956
  4. Abrahamson v. Security-First National BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
  5. Chaplin v. SullivanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API