Legal Opinion
United States v. M. E. Dibble
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided July 6, 1970No. 23091PublishedCited by 122 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HUFSTEDLER, Circuit Judge:
The United States brought this ejectment action against appellant Dibble to recover approximately 11 acres of land in the Lake Mendocino reservation area in California. Dibble answered, denying the charging averments of the complaint and asserting estoppel as an affirmative defense. After some preliminary procedural skirmishes, the Government moved for summary judgment. The motion was granted, and Dibble appeals from the ensuing judgment.
We reverse because the Government did not offer evidence sufficient to have sustained a finding that the County, under whose master…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Automatic Radio Mfg. Co., Inc. v. Hazeltine Research, IncSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
- The Union Insurance Society of Canton, Ltd. v. William Gluckin & Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1965
- Marshall G. Doza and Mary E. Doza v. American National Insurance Company, an Insurance CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1963
- F. S. Bowen Electric Co., Inc. v. J. D. Hedin Construction Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1963
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by122 opinions
- Hal Roach Studios, Inc., a Delaware Corporation v. Richard Feiner and Company, Inc., a New York CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- Charles E. Egger v. Harlan C. PhillipsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1983
- Sherman v. British Leyland Motors, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1979
- Latman v. BurdetteCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- Zenith Radio Corp. v. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1980
117 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.