Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. Forrester
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Error from District Court, Le Flore County; W. H. Brown, Judge. 'Action by Mrs. Jane Pitchford against the Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway .Company, revived after plaintiff’s death in the name of W. T. Forrester, administrator. Verdict and judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
DAVIS, C.
This action was begun in tho district court by Le Flore county, Okla., by Mrs. Jane Pitchford, against the Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Company, to recover a judgment for personal injuries alleged to have been received by plaintiff while a passenger on one of the trains of defendant. The parties will he referred to as they appeared in the trial court; that is plaintiff in error as defendant, and defendant in error as plaintiff.
The plaintiff took passage on one of defendant’s trains at Hartford, Ark., on the 5th day of November, 1909, for Howe, Okla. "When said…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. PitchfordSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
- Chicago, R. I. & P. R. Co. v. AustinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
- St. Louis & S. F. R. Co. v. FickSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
- Apel v. KelseySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1889
- Blackwell v. McCallSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. SheltonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929
- Russell v. DavidsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1947
- Crites, Adm'x v. City of MiamiSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
- In Re Carothers' EstateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1946
- Williams v. ZacharyCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1969