Legal Opinion

Russell v. Davidson

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided December 16, 1947No. 31389PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLuttrell, J.

This action was brought by plaintiff, Mollie E. Conatser, against defendants Harley Russell, W. M. Jones, Jr., and J. R. Davidson, trustees of the estate of M. B. Conatser, deceased, and others. Plaintiff asserted title to an undivided one-half interest in certain lands in LeFlore county, asked for the appointment of a receiver, the quieting and confirming of her title thereto, and for partition. Her ownership of the property was based upon her alleged election to take under the law, as jointly acquired property, the land involved in this action, instead of taking under the will of her…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Flesher v. CallahanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
  2. Stolfa v. GainesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929
  3. Estate of McCarthyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
  4. Elmore v. . ByrdSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1920
  5. Merchants' Nat. Bank of Mobile v. HubbardSupreme Court of Alabama · 1931

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Wilcox v. WickizerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1954
  2. Colson v. HallSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1952
  3. Pavlovitch v. WommackSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1952
  4. Sudheimer v. CheathamSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1968
  5. Brown v. MayfieldCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1989

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API