St. Louis & S. F. R. Co. v. Fick
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Error from, District Court, Bryan County; A. H. Ferguson, Judge. Action by Daisy Fick against the St. Louis & San Francisco Railroad Company. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtKane, C. J.
This was an action for damages for personal injuries, commenced by the defendant in error, plaintiff below, against the plaintiff in error, defendant below. Upon trial to a jury there was a verdict for the plaintiff, upon which judgment was duly entered, to reverse which this proceeding in error was commenced.
For convenience hereafter the parties will be called “plaintiff” and “defendant,” respectively, as they were designated in the trial court.
The petition states, in substance, that on the' 18th day of March, 1910, the plaintiff was en route from Ben-nington, Okla., to Paris, Tex., and that…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Pennsylvania Co. v. MarionIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
- Kelly v. Manhattan Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1889
- Yarnell v. Kansas City, Fort Scott & Memphis RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1893
- St. Louis S. F. R. Co. v. RushingSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
- New Orleans, Jackson, & Great Northern Railroad v. StathamMississippi Supreme Court · 1869
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- City of Tulsa v. HarmanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931
- Okmulgee Gas Co. v. KellySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
- Schaff v. CoyleSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
- Kaw Boiler Works v. FrymyerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
- Herring v. HoodSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.