Legal Opinion

Blackwell v. McCall

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided December 14, 1915No. 5310PublishedCited by 22 opinions

Error from, District Court, Rogers County; T. L. Brown, Judge. Action by King D. Blackwell and others against Robert T. McCáll, Jr., and others. Judgment for defendants, and plaintiffs bring error. ■

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

BLEAKMORE, C.

This action was commenced in the district court of Rogers county on the 15th day of April, 1912, by King JD. Blackwell, Solomon Blackwell, and Hazel Blackwell, as plaintiffs, against the defendants in error, as defendants, for the possession of certain lands, damages for the unlawful detention thereof, the cancellation of certain deeds, a mortgage and the assignment thereof, all of record, and to remove the same as a cloud upon their title.

The facts are that on September 5, 1905, Rosa Blackwell, the then owner of the lands involved, conveyed the same to her three…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Dull v. BlackmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
  2. Continental Gin Co. v. De BordSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
  3. Osgood v. BlackmoreIllinois Supreme Court · 1871
  4. De Watteville v. SimsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
  5. Harnish v. BramerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Pettis v. JohnstonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
  2. Cressler v. BrownSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
  3. McIntosh v. HoltgraveSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
  4. Gypsy Oil Co. v. CoverSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
  5. Protest of St. Louis-S. F. Ry. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API