Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. Shelton
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
HALL, C.
The essential facts in this case are as follows: The plaintiff in error, the defendant in the court below, is a common carrier of passengers operating a system of steam railways. At the town of Walters, in this state, plaintiff purchased a railway ticket over defendant’s railway to some other town or place. At the proper time, on the arrival of the train, by permission of the persons in charge of the train, plaintiff got on or boarded the train and walked some distance down the aisle of the coach and located a vacant seat and sat down. Within a very short while, and before the train…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Indianapolis & St. Louis Railroad v. HorstSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
- Roeser v. PeaseSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
- Sand Springs Railway Co. v. WesthaferSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
- Houston Electric Co. v. BraggTexas Commission of Appeals · 1925
- Chicago. R. I. & P. R. Co. v. DizneySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Markwell v. Whinery's Real Estate, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1994
- Criswell Baking Co. v. MilliganCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1948
- Phillips Petroleum Company v. PriceSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1956
- Denco Bus Co. v. KellerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1949
- Massachusetts Bonding Ins. Co. v. JonesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.