Legal Opinion

Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. Pitchford

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided February 28, 1914No. 3044PublishedCited by 41 opinions

Error from District Court, Ee Flore County -; Action by Jane Ritchford against the Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Company. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

SHARP, C.

Plaintiff’s original petition was filed October 14, 1910. On November 7th following, defendant filed its motion to require plaintiff to make more definite and certain her petition, which motion was in part sustained on November 29, 1910, and plaintiff was given leave to amend by inter-lineation, which was done. On December 1st defendant filed its answer, consisting of a general denial, and a separate and additional paragraph charging in general terms contributory negligence. On March 11, 1911, the plaintiff filed her motion to require defendant to make more specific the…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. City of Ardmore v. OrrSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
  2. Karle v. Kansas City, St. Joseph & Council Bluffs R. R.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1874
  3. Sluder v. St. Louis Transit Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1905
  4. Independent Cotton Oil Co. v. BeachamSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
  5. Terre Haute & Indianapolis Railroad v. VoelkerIllinois Supreme Court · 1889

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by41 opinions

  1. Cosden Pipe Line Co. v. BerrySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1922
  2. Missouri, O. & G. Ry. Co. v. CollinsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  3. Childs v. CookSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
  4. Whelan v. AdamsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
  5. Blackert v. LankfordSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API