Legal Opinion

Washington International Insurance v. Superior Court

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 31, 1998No. B114718PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

CROSKEY, J.

Washington International Insurance Company, Inc. (Washington) seeks review of an order denying its motion to strike portions of the first amended complaint of G. K. Backlund, Inc. (Backlund), a subcontractor. The purpose of its motion to strike was to delete Backlund’s claim that Washington, as the surety on a public works payment bond, was liable for certain sums which Green Coast, the contractor, had failed to pay to Backlund. These sums represented a statutory “interest penalty,” imposed pursuant to Public Contract Code section 10262.5, which Green Coast was required to…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Hinman v. Westinghouse Electric Co.California Supreme Court · 1970
  2. J. C. Penney Casualty Insurance v. M. K.California Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Becker v. IRM Corp.California Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Rawlings v. D. M. Oliver, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1979
  5. Peterson v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Cates Construction, Inc. v. Talbot PartnersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Morton Engineering & Construction, Inc. v. PatscheckCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
  3. Monette v. TinsleyNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1999
  4. Scott Co. v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
  5. MIRACLE AUTO CENTER v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API