Legal Opinion
Fultz v. Whittaker
District Court, W.D. Kentucky
Decided April 2, 2003No. Civil Action 3:98CV-374-HPublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
HEYBURN,Chief Judge.
Defendants, Officer Richard Whittaker, Officer Kevin Nuss and the Oldham County Fiscal Court (“Oldham County”) have moved for summary judgment on all Plaintiff, William Fultz’s, remaining claims. 1 Early on in the case, Defendants moved for summary judgment on qualified immunity grounds. The Court partially granted Defendants’ motion. 2 See Fultz v. Whittaker, 187 F.Supp.2d 695 (W.D.Ky.2001). Substantial discovery has occurred since then. Defendants argue that this evidence establishes that the Officers are entitled to qualified immunity on each of…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Graham v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Anderson v. CreightonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Woodcock v. City of Bowling GreenDistrict Court, W.D. Kentucky · 2016
- Magrum v. MeinkeDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2004
- Young v. City of RadcliffDistrict Court, W.D. Kentucky · 2008
- Battle v. ParrDistrict Court, W.D. Kentucky · 2020
- Bressler v. LuskDistrict Court, E.D. Kentucky · 2024
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.