Legal Opinion

Young v. City of Radcliff

District Court, W.D. Kentucky

Decided May 22, 2008No. Civil Action 3:06-CV-656-HPublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

JOHN G. HEYBURN, II, Chief Judge.

Plaintiff Stephen C. Young (“Young”) has brought a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 claim alleging that Defendants violated his Fourth, Fifth, and Fourteenth Amendment rights by their actions in connection with a shooting and arrest which occurred at Young’s residence (Count I). Young also brings various state law claims, including violation of Ky.Rev.Stat. Ann. § 344 (Kentucky Civ il Rights Act), false arrest/false imprisonment (Count IV), assault (Count V), battery (Count VI), intentional infliction of emotional distress (Count VII), and outrageous conduct…

2Cases cited64 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. Graham v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  5. Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970

59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. United States v. WellsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2011
  2. Quintana v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 2008
  3. United States v. Terry RobbinsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2012
  4. Jones v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2008
  5. ATIA v. Delta Airlines, Inc.District Court, E.D. Kentucky · 2010

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API