Trumbo v. Crestline Lake Arrowhead Water Agency
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtTamura, J.
The Crestline-Lake Arrowhead Water Agency is a public entity created by a special act of the Legislature (hereinafter referred to as the “Act”) 1 and activated by a vote of the qualified electors. At a bond election held on June 15, 1965, the voters authorized the agency to issue general obligation bonds totalling seven and one-half million dollars. Petitioners, who are residents, property owners, and qualified voters within the agency, sought a writ of mandate in the superior court challenging both the procedural validity of the bond election, as well as the substantive power of the agency…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- In re the Bonds of the Madera Irrigation DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Wisconsin & Michigan Railway Co. v. PowersSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
- Cedars of Lebanon Hospital v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
- Metropolitan Water Dist. v. MarquardtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
- Clark v. City of Los AngeLesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- County of Fresno v. MalmstromCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979
- Trent Meredith, Inc. v. City of OxnardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1981
- Pajaro Valley Water Management Agency v. AmrheinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
- Eastern Municipal Water District v. ScottCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
- Torres v. Laramie County School District No. 1Wyoming Supreme Court · 1973