Bliss v. Hamilton
California Supreme Court
APPLICATION for a Writ of Mandate directed to the Board of Supervisors of Los Angeles County. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtAngellotti, C. J.
This is an application for a writ of mandate requiring and commanding the respondents, who constitute the board of supervisors of Los Angeles County, to take certain proceedings relative to the issuance of bonds of the Los Angeles County Irrigation District No. 3, in accordance with the provisions of an act entitled “An act to provide for the formation, management and dissolution of county irrigation districts; for supplying the inhabitants thereof with water; for levying and collecting taxes on property in such districts; and for the issuance of county irrigation district bonds and the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- In re the Bonds of the Madera Irrigation DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Wheeler v. HerbertCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
- Schwiesau v. MahonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
3Cited by14 opinions
- The Housing Authority v. DockweilerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
- Barber v. GallowayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
- Anaheim Sugar Co. v. County of OrangeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
- Padlock Ranch, Inc. v. Washakie Needles Irrigation DistrictWyoming Supreme Court · 1936
- Eastern Municipal Water District v. ScottCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.