Legal Opinion

Jackson v. Bank of America

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 26, 1986No. E002332PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

McDANIEL, J.

In an action by Paul O. Jackson (plaintiff) against the Bank of America (the Bank) for rescission, fraud, and negligent misrepresentation, the Bank has appealed from a default judgment awarding plaintiff $43,016.64 in compensatory damages and $2.5 million in punitive (exemplary) damages, notwithstanding that the complaint, upon which the “prove-up” of damages was purportedly based, alleged no facts which demonstrated a monetary loss to plaintiff chargeable to any conduct by the Bank. Accordingly, we shall reverse the judgment with directions.

Synopsis of the Facts

In March…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Weitz v. YankoskyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966
  2. Burtnett v. KingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
  3. Kulchar v. KulcharCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
  4. Kulchar v. KulcharCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
  5. Uva v. EvansCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Electronic Funds Solutions v. MurphyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
  2. Falahati v. KondoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
  3. Beeman v. BurlingCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990
  4. JANE D. v. Ordinary MutualCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
  5. Molen v. FriedmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API