Legal Opinion

Molen v. Friedman

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 15, 1998No. Docket Nos. C026761, C027026PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

BLEASE, Acting P. J.

This case arises on consolidated appeals from a judgment in an action which collaterally attacks a default judgment (the collateral action) and from a new judgment in the action in which the default judgment was set aside (the default action).

The original default judgment awarded damages to respondents Morton L. and Marcy Friedman (the Friedmans) for breach of a commercial lease. The collateral action attacked the default judgment on the ground, inter alia, the damages awarded exceed the relief demanded in the complaint. The matter was tried to the court on the…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Armstrong v. ArmstrongCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Becker v. S.P v. Construction Co.California Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Canadian & American Mortgage & Trust Co. v. Clarita Land & Investment Co.California Supreme Court · 1903
  4. Christerson v. FrenchCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
  5. Estate of KeetCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Ferraro v. CamarlinghiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
  2. Garamendi v. Golden Eagle InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
  3. Schwab v. Southern California Gas Co.California Court of Appeal · 2004
  4. Levine v. SmithCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
  5. Underwood v. CorsinoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API