Legal Opinion

JANE D. v. Ordinary Mutual

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 3, 1995No. C018198PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

MORRISON, J.

Plaintiff Jane D. brought suit against Father Michael Dermody. Beginning when she was 15, she sought counseling from him and he induced her to have sexual relations with him. Her suit resulted in a default judgment. Plaintiff then brought a declaratory relief action seeking to establish coverage for that judgment under a policy issued by defendant The Ordinary Mutual. Defendant’s motion for summary judgment was granted and plaintiff appeals from the subsequent judgment. She contends several of her theories of coverage were ignored and material factual issues remain. We…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Gray v. Zurich Insurance Co.California Supreme Court · 1966
  2. Clemmer v. Hartford Insurance Co.California Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Leal v. Holy Spirit Ass'n for Unification of World ChristianityCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Ann M. v. Pacific Plaza Shopping CenterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
  5. Horace Mann Ins. Co. v. Barbara B.California Supreme Court · 1993

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Bohrer v. Church Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1998
  2. Uhrich v. State Farm Fire & Cas. Co.California Court of Appeal · 2003
  3. San Diego Housing Commission v. Industrial Indemnity Co.California Court of Appeal · 2002
  4. Uhrich v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.California Court of Appeal · 2003
  5. Blackhawk Corp. v. Gotham Ins. Co.California Court of Appeal · 1997

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API