Legal Opinion

Dornberg v. City of Spokane

Washington Supreme Court

Decided May 15, 1923No. 17730PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBridges, J.

The only question in this case is the validity of § 11, of ordinance number C 1590, as amended by ordinance No. C 2093, of the city of Spokane, which ordinance is with reference to the business of auctioneering. Section 11 reads in part as follows:

“It shall be unlawful for any person, firm, company or corporation, to sell or expose for sale by way of public vendue or auction, except under and by virtue of legal process, any property, real or personal, within the.following described portion of the city of Spokane, to wit: (here follows a description of a portion of the business district of…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. People Ex Rel. Schwab v. . GrantNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
  2. Ex Parte HadacheckCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
  3. Ex Parte Quong WoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
  4. People v. GibbsMichigan Supreme Court · 1915
  5. Detamore v. HindleyWashington Supreme Court · 1915

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. ABC Liquidators, Inc. v. Kansas CitySupreme Court of Missouri · 1959
  2. State Ex Rel. Hardy v. Superior CourtWashington Supreme Court · 1930
  3. Balesh v. Hot SpringsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1927
  4. Billig v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1929
  5. Korber v. City of PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API