Detamore v. Hindley
Washington Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Spokane county, Blake, J., entered November 24, 1913, upon granting a nonsuit, dismissing an action for a writ of mandate, after a trial to the court.
1Opinion of the CourtEllis, J.
In this action, the plaintiffs sought a writ of mandate requiring the defendants, commissioners of the city of Spokane, to cause to be removed from Erie, Ivory, Denver, Perry, Hogan, Helena, Madelia, Magnolia, Pittsburgh and Napa streets, in that city, the supports of certain bridges or overhead crossings maintained therein by the intervener, Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Company for its railroad tracks.
*324The case was tried upon a statement of agreed facts in substance as follows: In January and May, 1910, the Chicago, Milwaukee & Puget Sound Railway Company, predecessor in interest of…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Odd Fellows' Cemetery Ass'n v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
- Crozer v. People ex rel. HanbergIllinois Supreme Court · 1903
- Murphy v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1910
- Seibert v. Missouri Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1905
- Summerfield v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1902
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by47 opinions
- Lenci v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1964
- Weden v. San Juan CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1998
- Weden v. San Juan CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1998
- Petstel, Inc. v. County of KingWashington Supreme Court · 1969
- Brown v. City of YakimaWashington Supreme Court · 1991
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.