Legal Opinion

Korber v. City of Portland

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided October 23, 1930PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBelt, J.

This is a suit to test the validity of ordinance 57412 of the city of Portland, which prohibits auction sales of jewelry. We adopt the opinion of the learned trial court, eliminating therefrom certain parts not material to questions presented on this appeal:

“Plaintiff, doing business under the name of Alder Jewelry Company at 263 Morrison street, Portland, Oregon, seeks a restraining order against the municipal authorities to prevent interference by the municipal authorities with his right to conduct a closing out auction of his stock of jewelry.
“Plaintiff alleges that for the past seventeen…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Allgeyer v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  2. Adams v. TannerSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
  3. Murphy v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  4. Weaver v. Palmer Brothers Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
  5. State v. RedmonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1907

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Ex Parte StrauchCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1945
  2. Hagerman v. City of St. LouisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1955
  3. State v. EnglishCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API