Legal Opinion

Barkus v. Thornton-Fuller Co.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 13, 1945No. Appeal, 50PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Dithrich, J.,

This is a workmen’s compensation case in which the claimant suffered almost complete blindness. The referee found that the injury was caused by an accident, classified the claimant as a “nondescript on the labor market,” and awarded compensation for total disability. Both the board and the court below affirmed. The employer-defendant and its insurance carrier bring this appeal.

Claimant, Charles Barkus, was employed by defendant, Thornton-Fuller Co., as a motor tester. There was no useful vision in his right eye, because of glaucoma, but there was normal vision and…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Vorbnoff v. Mesta Machine Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1926
  2. McCauley v. Imperial Woolen Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1918
  3. Gausman v. R. T. Pearson Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1925
  4. Lacey v. Washburn & Williams Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
  5. Elonis v. Lytle Coal Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1938

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Cairgle v. AMERICAN R. AND SS CORP.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
  2. Cairgle v. American Radiator & Standard Sanitary Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
  3. Lambing v. Consolidation Coal Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1947
  4. Adams v. Reed Roller Bit CompanySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1959
  5. McClemens v. Penn Auto PartsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1956

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API