Barkus v. Thornton-Fuller Co.
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Dithrich, J.,
This is a workmen’s compensation case in which the claimant suffered almost complete blindness. The referee found that the injury was caused by an accident, classified the claimant as a “nondescript on the labor market,” and awarded compensation for total disability. Both the board and the court below affirmed. The employer-defendant and its insurance carrier bring this appeal.
Claimant, Charles Barkus, was employed by defendant, Thornton-Fuller Co., as a motor tester. There was no useful vision in his right eye, because of glaucoma, but there was normal vision and…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Vorbnoff v. Mesta Machine Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1926
- McCauley v. Imperial Woolen Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1918
- Gausman v. R. T. Pearson Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1925
- Lacey v. Washburn & Williams Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
- Elonis v. Lytle Coal Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Cairgle v. AMERICAN R. AND SS CORP.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
- Cairgle v. American Radiator & Standard Sanitary Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
- Lambing v. Consolidation Coal Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1947
- Adams v. Reed Roller Bit CompanySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1959
- McClemens v. Penn Auto PartsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.