McClemens v. Penn Auto Parts
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Wright, J.,
Carl McClemens, claimant in this case, was injured on August 1,1953, in the course of his employment with Penn Auto Parts, when a piece of steel penetrated his left eye. The Referee found as a fact that claimant “suffered the loss of use of vision of the left eye for all practical uses and purposes”, and made an award for the loss of the eye under the permanent injury schedule of the Workmens Compensation Law. The employer appealed to the Workmens Compensation Board, which affirmed the Referee’s findings of fact, conclusions of law, and order. An appeal was then taken to…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Monahan v. Seeds & DurhamSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
- Nelson v. Borough of GreenvilleSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
- Diaz v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1944
- Messikomer v. Baldwin Locomotive WorksSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
- Diaz v. Jones and Laughlin Steel Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1952
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Curran v. Walter E. Knipe & Sons, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1958
- Hershey Estates v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
- Susman v. Kaufmann's Department StoreSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
- Oliver v. Westinghouse Electric Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1958
- Kubler v. YeagerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.