Legal Opinion
Adams v. Reed Roller Bit Company
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided February 24, 1959No. 38171PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BERRY, Justice.
On December 3, 1957, J. C. Adams, hereafter referred to as “Claimant”, filed his first notice of injury and claim for compensation. He stated therein that on “several occasions during the past year” he sustained “permanent” injuries to his eyes resulting from his “eyes (being) burned by welding equipment” while employed as a “welder’s helper” by Reed Roller Bit Company.
In its order denying the claim for compensation, the Industrial Commission concluded as follows:
“Claimant did not sustain an accident as alleged in his Form-3 claim filed herein.
“That claimant’s loss of vision…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Johnson Oil Refining Co. v. GuthrieSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
- Winona Oil Co. v. SmithsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1922
- Andrews Mining & Milling Co. v. AtkinsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1943
- Vaughn Rush v. StumpSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932
- Ward v. Beatrice Creamery Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Peabody Galion Corp. v. WorkmanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1982
- Woodward & Company v. State Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1960
- Berryhill v. Prudential Premium Co. of OklahomaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1964
- Garr-Wooley Oil Company v. YearginSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1960
- Ideal Cement Company v. BucklerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1960
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.