Legal Opinion
McNamara v. Gargett
Michigan Supreme Court
Decided February 2, 1888PublishedCited by 47 opinions
Error to Gratiot. (Hart, J.) Assumpsit. Defendant brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion..
1Opinion of the CourtLong, J.
Plaintiff brought suit in the circuit court for Gratiot county against the defendant, by declaration upon the common counts in assumpsit, with copy of note attached.The note reads a3 follows:
“ $125.00. Sumner, October 21, 1885.
“ Fourteen months after date, I promise to pay A, A. Griffith or bearer one hundred and twenty-five dollars, value received, with interest at seven per cent, per annum.
“W. J. Gaegett.”
The defendant pleaded the general issue, and gave notice—
“ That the defendant above named, on the trial of this cause, will give in evidence, under the general issue above pleaded, and…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Snyder v. WilleyMichigan Supreme Court · 1876
3Cited by47 opinions
- Twin City Pipe Line Co. v. Harding Glass Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1931
- State v. ITM, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1966
- Hogston v. BellIndiana Supreme Court · 1916
- Epps v. 4 Quarters Restoration LLCMichigan Supreme Court · 2015
- People v. Bestline Products, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1976
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.