Kehaya v. Axton
District Court, S.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
WOOLSEY, District Judge.
I refuse to include in the conclusions of law the thirteenth conclusion of law proposed by the plaintiff, and have stricken it out.
The findings of fact and the other conclusions of law proposed I have signed and am filing with certain corrections and additions.
I. In my memorandum opinion filed March 15, 1940, D.C., 32 F.Supp. 266, at page 273, I stated that the commencement of any ancillary proceeding to enforce damages on the attachment bond or undertaking — hereinafter referred to as the bond —must await final judgment in this cause. The defendants’ counsel have,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Russell v. FarleySupreme Court of the United States · 1882
- Pease v. Rathbun-Jones Engineering Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1917
- Thropp v. ErbNew York Court of Appeals · 1930
- Kehaya v. AxtonDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1940
- Universal Transp. Co. v. National Surety Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1918
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Tamminga v. SuterDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 1962
- Clare v. GuidiNew York Supreme Court · 1958